Here transplant surgery is surgery okay so it means it has to be a doctor. It is surgery, however. it is a special type of surgery where you keep repeating the same surgical maneuvers and thousands of thousands of times now that doesn't exist in any other surgery including ,the cosmetic surgeries we do.
Like no surgery breast surgery you do a different Minerva
every second of your service or your surgery and you finish it. It’s like
drawing a painting where none of the parts of the painting are symmetrical or
saying so it's an individual, performance, where, there’s no repetition. Whereas
hair transplant surgeries you just take dig a hole put it in and you do that
thousands and sometimes, tens, of, thousands ,of times.
So that’s ,why ,there are. Parts of this procedure which are.
technically heavy rather than artistically heavy so there's no judgment being made.
you're just repeating a Minerva that you have mastered or you should have mastered.
and you're doing it so many times that it's adds up to a very very labor
intensive and long procedure so that's why in this type of surgeries it is
possible.
To license other medical staff in the united states there are
so called, nurse ,practitioners ,and ,physician assistants. who are trained
licensed to do some parts of surgery and i was surprised even to hear that a
nurse practitioner in the united states some states could do the surgery even
without a surgeon being in the facility. so it can go up to that level you know
because of the nature of the procedure.
But even in you know life critically important surgeries like
transplanting other tissues. organs. in the in the far east there are trained
and astronauts technicians that come in. tie the blood vessels together so the
organ gets the blood circulation because they're trained only to do that there
are even.
Able to do it better than the doctor himself so the doctor
steps back the technician does the vessels and he comes back and continues the
surgery so, it shows that. Parts of surgery could be delegated to people who
are especially trained to keep doing the same thing which doesn't require
special judgment.
And it's just a repetition and here transplant is probably on
the top of that because as i said it's repeating the same thing thousands of
times so here transplant surgery becomes a team's work. so different people
take parts in the surgery when it's done. however in the world and in the
countries there are differences in the practices like it could be a doctor
heavy procedure or it could be a technician heavy procedure.
Depending on laws regulations marketing dynamics prices
demand and many things so it can be practice different ways.
now turkey is the center of the world for cheaper hair
transplants now the primary reason for that is. because the laws allow for more
delegation that means even the whole procedure could ,be ,done ,by a
technician. and that's still within the regulations of the. I debate if that's
a very good idea but it's a fact and it applies to some states like for
instance in ,California ,in British ,Colombia.
The same thing applies technicians can do surgery under the
doctor's supervision so in some countries and states this is both legal. and there
are people licensed to do it. so now turkey is as I said the The center for
cheaper hair transplants. the primary reason is this the secondary reason is
that all the labors are cheaper so you have to add those tools up you know even
the equivalent ,labor is cheaper.
plus it's also possible to delegate more so the price
difference is great at one to ten one to twenty compared ,to ,some ,other
countries. okay so but some of those or most of those surgeries are also not
only very cheap they're also low quality. one of the reasons is there's no
training there's no supervising doctor it's like you know it's not just
delegating during the surgery.
everything is delegated like they just teams come in and do
the surgery even the company doesn't know who these people are and so it can be
that left ,so ,there's no quality control. so that means if you delegate it
doesn't mean it's perfectly safe in every way. there has to be quality control.
was in some. surgical centers. there is doctor's involvement and also training
available so that there is quality control so now obviously there are three
parts.
Of a hair transplant procedure the harvesting part now it's
harvesting part donor harvesting it could be two ways it could be stripped or
it could be f u e. and as a recipient site making so you make incisions to make
the recipient side and then there's the placement you call that implantation so
there's a ,placement ,part ,three parts. so now depending on. practicality and
regulations this could be practiced different ways as i said in turkey it could
,be ,fully ,delegated ,to .technicians.
the doctor does all the cuts are in the medical term
incisions so if he does all the cuts or she it means this is called doctor only
surgery it doesn't mean. that there's nothing done by other people like this is
going to be if this is in the case of a strip there's going to be grafting
section under the microscope done by ,a ,team ,of technicians. there's actually
modification to the tissue or it's outside of the body or it could be
arrangement or kind of arranging ,the graphs trimming them.
Both in f u e n strip. uh these are done by the technicians placement the placement does not involve an incision that doesn't involve a cut in the human body ,so it's mostly done worldwide. by technicians. so and this is called doctor only surgery so when we say doctor only surgery it means the doctor is doing whenever there is a cut and the other parts are done. so it doesn't mean that the placement is also done by the doctor.
Hair Transplant Pricing Per Graft vs Per Session
per graft versus per session i think this is an interesting
topic the traditional way in the western world to price hair transplants ,is to
price per graft. I’m going to talk about the problems i see in this pricing
method now initially it looks like the more drafts you, do ,there's ,more work so.
it looks like it's normal. to charge for the number of graphs you do it's like
buying let's say a ,dance ,of ,apples ,or oranges. But I’m not sure if that's
entirely true and here are the reasons why. Now there's a technical side and
there's a philosophical and ethical side to this problem the technical is that
when we do a. how, do ,we ,take ,more graphs.
So how do we take more graphs the way to take more graphs in
f u e is to do two things one ,is ,to do it faster. If ,we ,do faster. we will
do more crafts. Now if we do it faster. we actually damage more so we cause
more tissue damage more graph ,damage and .wastage. so if we're paying per
graph and. we're going to do it faster in order to ,give ,you ,more graphs. We’re
actually increasing the damage and wastage so you're paying more to get more
damage so as you can see that's not the patient's benefit.
The other way to increase the number of graphs not by time
but by area. is to do. Closer punch holes so if you do more closer punch holes
you'll get more grass. And if you do two close punch holes you ,cause ,one
,more ,scarring. And two you decrease the donor density significantly that it
may be depleted and look moth eaten. so you're destroying the appearance and
the aesthetics of the donor area.
So the second way of getting more grads by making closer
punch holes doesn't benefit the patient either so you're paying again for,
something that doesn't benefit you. The third way to get more graphs in f u e
is to use a smaller f u e punch a smaller surgical punch. Now this may sound
good at first but if you use a smaller f u e punch than needed that's a punch
that is smaller than the width of your vodka unit.
which will not be able to take that volatility unit in. you're
going to cause more damage more phobic transactions if the punch is too small
so the third way of doing more grass is using a smaller punch also increases
,the ,damage and wasted hairs. so as you can see there are three ways
surgically in fu. that brings us more graphs which none of them are in the
patient's benefit so by paying per graft.
you are encouraging the clinic. to do something that is not
in your benefit. now in strip surgery f u t f u t you remove a strip. so again
there's ways to take more graphs one is you take a wider strip. you take a
wider strip then you can actually take you're going to close the wound under
tension and this is going to be much more painful difficult to heal. and you're
going to get a worse car. I’ve seen uh let's say on public forums where the
patient had a huge number of four thousand grass strip taken and the surgeon
was unable to close the wound.
and he had to leave it open and the patient received a two to
three fingers thick scar and a very bad healing period that was because ,the
,agreement ,was ,on graphs. By taking four thousand routes the clinic kept
their promise. there was nothing in the agreement telling if the wound is not
closed or the scar is poor there's going to be a penalty for the cling no
agreement is for graphs so the agreement is kept. The other thing in strip is that.
Let’s say we took a strip which is a normal strip proper
closure no problem there. But in order to get more graphs we can over-cut or we
call that subdividing folic units to make more single and double. Haired
volleyball units so we get more graphs so let's say we have a strip containing
six thousand hairs theoretically we could
create. six thousand graphs with one hair each. so or we could do. two
thousand graphs with three hairs each. so for the same strip with the same amount
of hairs.
you would pay three times more when the clinic over cuts or
subdivides the funicular units. and so you pay three times more for the same
coverage and same number of hairs. so as you can see again it's not your
benefit to pay ,for ,the ,number ,of graphs. and the other thing related to
this is proven in scientific studies that skinny graphs which are predominantly
single haired survive less.
than chubby graphs so not only you pay more for the same
amount of hairs but you get poorer growth. so as you can see none of that is to
the patient's benefit so these were all surgical reasons why paying ,for ,the
,number ,of graphs. is not to the patient's benefit. now there's ethical
reasons too for instance. if you pay for the number of graphs the chances are
the clinic will be encouraged to offer you ,a ,higher ,number ,of graphs.
so they make more money so chances are you will be advised to
use up more of your donor hairs that perhaps you didn't need that much there's
clinics that will recommend ,four ,or ,five ,thousand graphs. whereas two
thousand would do so as you can see there's an ethical problem and the other
ethical problem I have in mind ,is ,for instance let's say uh. you have a
certain budget OK yeah five thousand dollars in our clinic.
we charge. five dollars per graph so we find out that your budget
is five ,thousand dollars and in this case you can afford ,only ,one ,thousand
graphs. so the clever salesperson on the clinic is going to realize that
there's no point in recommending your three thousand graphs even ,if ,you ,do
need it. because he he knows you're not going to be able to pay and you're
going to run to another clinic that's cheaper and recommends he says ,you'll
,need ,one ,thousand graphs.
And you make an agreement thinking that that's within your
budget but you're getting an amount of graphs that's too small for your
situation and you're going to get a result that's not satisfactory. From an
ethical point of view this clinic should have refused you because you have
insufficient funds. But because you're paying per graph they're OK free.
To give you the number that you can afford so for all of
these reasons I believe paying per, graft ,is ,harmful ,and ,unethical. Paying
perception on the other hand. Is ,more healthy. Because you're just paying for
the performance of the clinic that you believe they're going to do their best
now a quick question you may ask what if the clinic does ,deliberately ,less
,number ,of graphs. Because they're too lazy when the agreement is on
perception yes they can do that.
but this clinic will be judged with the results they provide
so if the clinic keeps doing less number of graphs than needed. they will get
poorer results and less coverage and then other patients will look at that and
say we don't want to go to this clinic so as you can see if the clinic does
that they will not be able to get away with it. so paying per session is much
healthier than paying per graph but there's one.
Extra thing i have to say is that in turkey surgeries ninety
nine percent of surgeries are charged per session but, not ,for ,an ethical
reason. It’s ,because most of these surgeries there's no doctor and technicians
are used for the surgery. And then it becomes an unnecessary for the clinic to
charge for graphs because it doesn't matter for the clinic to tell these
technicians to take two thousand or four thousand graphs it doesn't matter for
them. so they just had a fixed fee. So the only exception that you have to look
at is if a clinic is charging per session.
Try and make sure this is not a technician only clinic with no doctor in the procedure because they are charging for the session, not because they're too ethical. I hope you got something useful out of this. Thank you.